Three-Tier Pricing Comparison — Anchored Middle-Plan Variant

What it does

• Three-column plan layout — three plans sit side by side with matching row labels for clean horizontal comparison
• Middle-tier visual anchor — the recommended plan stands taller, has an accent color, and carries a "most popular" badge
• Feature row alignment — every feature appears as a row across all three plans, with checkmarks, dashes, or values per cell
• Per-tier CTA — each plan has its own button so buyers can commit to their chosen tier directly
• Optional billing cycle switch — a small toggle can flip all three plans between monthly and annual billing
• Bottom contact-sales fallback — a quiet line below the table points enterprise buyers to a sales conversation

Best use cases

• SaaS businesses — running standard three-tier pricing with a recommended middle plan
• Course platforms — offering individual, team, and enterprise tiers
• Membership site owners — comparing basic, plus, and premium memberships
• Tools and apps — anchoring the most popular plan to channel new buyers there
• Coaching and consulting platforms — surfacing self-serve, supported, and premium tiers in one comparison

What you can change with your DNA

When you run this through the remix skill, your CCOS DNA — brand, voice, audience — drives these decisions automatically:

• Colors — slots for the section background, three plan-card backgrounds (middle accented), badge color, feature checkmark color, and the CTA buttons
• Fonts — one professional font with a heavier weight for plan names and prices and a regular weight for feature rows
• Copy — plan names, prices, the recommended badge, every feature row label and per-plan value, three CTAs, and the contact-sales fallback line
• Images — optional small icons per feature row; otherwise text-only
• Behavior — choose which tier is anchored, whether the billing cycle toggle is included, and how plans collapse on mobile